|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Zeta Zhul
Caldari Preemptive Paranoia
|
Posted - 2011.07.02 03:24:00 -
[1]
Originally by: Mark Hamill
Originally by: Entity You might want to look into using the client cache instead. Can even automate things then.
No API usable for the language ET is written and after looking at code for sc****rs that do exist, I gave up.
What language is ET written in? And can I help? You're talking about scraping the client cache to get market data right? Current regional orders and/or market history right?
Gotta warn you though. Even using cache sc****rs the stupidity doesn't end. Part of the path the client cache resides in is a number. Every patch they increment the number. So depending on how you do things it may or may not be a pain.
|
Zeta Zhul
Caldari Preemptive Paranoia
|
Posted - 2011.07.03 01:47:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Mark Hamill
Originally by: Maggeridon Thoraz Edited by: Maggeridon Thoraz on 02/07/2011 16:49:14 just wait till ccp soundwave thinks again like this and you can flush your app in the toilet
Originally by: CCP Soundwave Hey guys!
We took it out because it seems like a bit of an odd piece of information for the majority of our users. In general, having import/export features aren't really something I'm thrilled with.
The more I'm finding out about him, the more I REALLY dislike him.
1. Shall we set up a poll for all EO players on who at CCP we want fired for incompetence?
2. Ahhh Delphi. I still have the v7 cd. Programmed in that language for a few years. It really is a shame that Borland basically screwed it all up.
3. You can get market orders from the API. So that will give you a list of items currently being traded by the user and then use that list to filter the output from the cache sc****r.
|
Zeta Zhul
Caldari Preemptive Paranoia
|
Posted - 2011.07.03 01:50:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Tonto Auri
Originally by: Zeta Zhul ...Gotta warn you though. Even using cache sc****rs the stupidity doesn't end. Part of the path the client cache resides in is a number. Every patch they increment the number. So depending on how you do things it may or may not be a pain.
This your reference isn't true. All you have to do is to account for it, which is no more than 5 lines of code executed once in a program run.
Not going to get into a fight with you but I did write "So depending on how you do things it may or may not be a pain.".
|
Zeta Zhul
Caldari Preemptive Paranoia
|
Posted - 2011.07.05 05:17:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Trenker I agree. The API does not meet todays standards you have when working with a web API. Implemented features are often buggy and incomplete, changes break existing things, often without a warning and the access handling is not very web 2.0. If CCP wants to create a licensing program, they should continue to improve the product, so the hassle of getting a license (the money involved is only part of that), is worth the result.
Still: I guess your infantile ranting is not helping anyone.
Yeah! Because not complaining has worked so well in dealing with CCP.
|
|
|
|